the research library food, supplements and pregnancy

pregnancy, first trimester and beyond

You deserve the actual trials, not the forum version.

Pregnancy is where confident wellness advice can do the most damage, because it can crowd out real obstetric care. This page is a reading list of the trials themselves, so you and your clinician can look at the same numbers.

please read this first

This page is research, not medical advice. Progesterone is a prescription decision that belongs to you and your OB or midwife, and nothing here should change what you take without that conversation. If you are bleeding or in pain, call your care team.

what they foundthe papersmy bottom linekeep reading

12papers
11studies in people
5counterpoints

this page, by tier

  • 10 human evidence
  • 1 early human
  • 0 lab + animal
  • 1 background

the short version

what the research found

the headline numbers

  • human evidencehonest limit

    In 836 women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage, first-trimester vaginal progesterone gave live births in 65.8% versus 63.3% on placebo, not a significant difference.

  • human evidencehonest limit

    In 4,153 women bleeding in early pregnancy, live birth was 75% with progesterone versus 72% with placebo, just short of significance.

  • human evidence

    In women with three or more previous miscarriages and current bleeding, live birth was 72% with progesterone versus 57% with placebo.

  • human evidence

    Across 31 trials and 11,644 women, vaginal progesterone lowered birth before 34 weeks in high-risk single pregnancies by about 22%.

  • human evidencehonest limit

    The confirmatory 17-OHPC trial found preterm birth before 35 weeks in 11.0% versus 11.5% on placebo, and the drug's approval was later withdrawn.

  • human evidence

    In women who had a previous pregnancy affected by a neural tube defect, folic acid around conception cut the chance of it happening again by 72%.

my honest bottom line

Progesterone did not raise live birth rates overall in either large first-trimester trial; the signal sits in women with three or more previous miscarriages who are bleeding now. Folic acid around conception has the strongest prenatal nutrient result on this page. The biggest limitation is that subgroup findings raise questions rather than settle them, and the decision belongs to you and your obstetric team, not a website.

evidence at a glance

12 papers

  • human evidence10
  • early human1
  • lab + animalnone yet0
  • background1

Includes 5 counterpoints.

every title links to the original

the papers

Sorted from the strongest human evidence down to the lab work and background reading. Counterpoints are marked, and they stay in on purpose.

human evidence
Evaluating Progestogens for Preventing Preterm birth International Collaborative (EPPPIC): meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised controlled trials
EPPPIC Group 2021 The Lancet

Individual data from 31 trials and 11,644 women. In high-risk single pregnancies, vaginal progesterone lowered birth before 34 weeks (risk ratio 0.78) and 17-OHPC showed a smaller, borderline effect (0.83). Oral progesterone had too little evidence, and progestogens were not supported for unselected twins or triplets.

human evidencecounterpoint
A Randomized Trial of Progesterone in Women with Bleeding in Early Pregnancy
Coomarasamy A 2019 New England Journal of Medicine

4,153 women with bleeding in early pregnancy used vaginal progesterone 400 mg twice daily or placebo. Live birth after at least 34 weeks was 75% versus 72%, which missed statistical significance (P = 0.08). Side effects did not differ.

human evidence
Omega-3 fatty acid addition during pregnancy
Middleton P 2018 Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

A Cochrane review of 70 trials and 19,927 women. Omega-3 in pregnancy lowered births before 37 weeks by 11% and before 34 weeks by 42%, graded high-quality evidence, and slightly raised pregnancies running past 42 weeks (2.6% versus 1.6%).

human evidencecounterpoint
Vitamin D Supplementation in Pregnancy and Lactation and Infant Growth
Roth DE 2018 New England Journal of Medicine

1,300 pregnancies in Bangladesh were randomized to weekly vitamin D at one of three doses or placebo, some continuing after birth. Infant length at one year did not differ, vitamin D levels rose as expected, and the highest dose group had more possible excess calcium in the urine.

show all 12 papersshow fewer
human evidencecounterpoint
A Randomized Trial of Progesterone in Women with Recurrent Miscarriages
Coomarasamy A 2015 New England Journal of Medicine

836 women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage used vaginal progesterone or placebo in the first trimester. Live births were 65.8% versus 63.3%, a difference of 2.5 points that was not significant. Side effects did not differ.

human evidence
Prevention of neural tube defects: results of the Medical Research Council Vitamin Study
MRC Vitamin Study Research Group 1991 The Lancet

1,817 women who had already had a pregnancy affected by a neural tube defect took folic acid, other vitamins, both or neither around conception. There were 6 affected pregnancies in the folic acid groups versus 21 in the others, a 72% lower risk. The other vitamins showed no significant effect.

keep reading

more from the library

all the pillarsthe research libraryabout Dr. Kaylan

This page summarizes published research for education. It is not medical advice. Please make any decision about progesterone, supplements or prenatal care with your OB or midwife. Summaries by Dr. Kaylan Jackson, PhD, a chemist, not a physician. Citations checked against PubMed and Crossref, September 2026.